Paul Merson says that Ruben Amorim Would Have Suited Chelsea

In a recent analysis, former Arsenal star and football pundit Paul Merson shared his thoughts on why Ruben Amorim, the highly-rated manager, would have been a better fit for Chelsea than his current role at Manchester United.

Merson’s comments highlight the tactical mismatch between Amorim’s preferred system and Manchester United’s squad, while praising Chelsea’s roster as an ideal match for the Portuguese manager’s style.

Paul Merson’s Take on Ruben Amorim’s Fit for Chelsea

Paul Merson didn’t hold back when discussing how Amorim’s tactical approach would have thrived at Chelsea.

He stated, “He would have been a perfect fit for Chelsea. They’ve got world-class wing-backs in Reece James and Malo Gusto, they’ve got the best holding midfield player in the league in Moises Caicedo. It would fit the players.”

Amorim is known for his use of a 3-4-3 formation, which relies heavily on dynamic wing-backs and a solid defensive midfielder. Chelsea’s squad, with players like Reece James and Malo Gusto offering versatility and attacking flair from the wing-back positions, seems tailor-made for this system. Additionally, Moises Caicedo’s ability to anchor the midfield provides the defensive stability that Amorim’s setup demands, allowing attacking players to flourish.

Why Chelsea’s Squad Suits Amorim’s Tactics

Chelsea’s current roster is packed with players who could seamlessly adapt to Amorim’s high-intensity, possession-based style. Reece James, when fit, is one of the Premier League’s most dynamic right-backs, capable of contributing both defensively and offensively. Malo Gusto has also proven to be a reliable option, showcasing his pace and crossing ability. These qualities align perfectly with Amorim’s reliance on wing-backs to stretch the pitch and create attacking opportunities.

Moises Caicedo, whom Merson called “the best holding midfield player in the league,” has been a standout performer for Chelsea. His ability to break up play, distribute the ball, and cover ground would complement Amorim’s system, which requires a disciplined midfielder to balance the team’s attacking ambition. With players like Cole Palmer and Enzo Fernandez providing creativity, Chelsea could have been a tactical dream for Amorim.

Manchester United’s Tactical Mismatch

In contrast, Merson believes Manchester United’s squad is ill-suited to Amorim’s preferred 3-4-3 formation. He remarked,

“You look at Man United and this system does not suit the squad they’ve got at all. The two wing-backs are nowhere near it, nowhere near good enough.”

Manchester United’s current full-back options, such as Diogo Dalot and Luke Shaw, may lack the consistent attacking output and stamina required to thrive as wing-backs in Amorim’s system. Unlike Chelsea’s James and Gusto, United’s options haven’t shown the same level of dynamism to fit the demanding role.

Merson also pointed out a lack of energy in United’s midfield, stating, “No legs in midfield. Everything is up against him.” Amorim’s system relies on midfielders who can press relentlessly and transition quickly, but United’s midfield, including players like Casemiro and Christian Eriksen, may struggle to meet these demands due to their age or playing style. This mismatch could hinder Amorim’s ability to implement his vision at Old Trafford.

The Importance of Wing-Backs in Amorim’s System

Merson emphasized the critical role of wing-backs in making Amorim’s system work, saying, “And they are a big part of this formation working.” In a 3-4-3 setup, wing-backs are responsible for providing width, supporting attacks, and tracking back defensively. Chelsea’s depth in this area, with players like James, Gusto, and even Ben Chilwell, gives them an edge over Manchester United, where the wing-back options are less suited to the role.

Amorim’s appointment at Manchester United has generated excitement, but Merson’s analysis suggests the Portuguese manager faces an uphill battle. Without the right personnel to execute his tactical vision, Amorim may need to adapt his system or rely on significant recruitment to bridge the gap. The lack of “legs” in midfield and the limitations of United’s wing-backs could make it difficult for Amorim to replicate the success he enjoyed at Sporting CP, where his 3-4-3 system led to a Primeira Liga title.

Could Chelsea Have Been a Missed Opportunity?

Merson’s comments raise the question of whether Chelsea missed an opportunity by not pursuing Amorim. With a squad that appears to align perfectly with his tactical philosophy, Chelsea could have provided the ideal platform for Amorim to showcase his managerial prowess in the Premier League. Instead, the Blues have continued with their current setup, while Amorim takes on the challenge of reshaping Manchester United.

Paul Merson’s analysis sheds light on the tactical nuances of Ruben Amorim’s managerial style and why Chelsea’s squad would have been a better fit than Manchester United’s. With world-class wing-backs like Reece James and Malo Gusto, and a midfield anchor like Moises Caicedo, Chelsea could have been the perfect destination for Amorim’s 3-4-3 system.

Meanwhile, Manchester United’s squad deficiencies, particularly in the wing-back and midfield areas, pose significant challenges for the Portuguese manager. As Amorim embarks on his journey at Old Trafford, Merson’s words serve as a reminder of the importance of squad compatibility in achieving managerial success.